Why Ron Paul?

This email was sent to me by a family I am good friends with. Like me they are also very concerned about the state of our country and with the liberties which we have been given, we desire to use our vote to the canidate who most glorifies the Lord. I do not believe many Christians are aware nor really care about the state of our Land so I hope and trust that this email I got will be a blessing to you all. Voddie Baucham is a well known trusted Christian man who has done much for God's Kingdom. My encouragment to you all is to really pray for our country and our leaders, that God will grant us repentance and restore righteousness to our land. If you are not considering Ron Paul I really encourage you all to do some research on all the candidates and see which one could really make the difference. Grace and Peace. Enjoy.





http://www.gracefamilybaptist.net/voddie-baucham-ministries/blog/why-ron-paul-2012-01/

Why Ron Paul?

date Jan 16, 2012
author Voddie Baucham

"Voddie, because I have a great respect for you and your opinion I
would really like to know why you are voting for Ron Paul ? I have not
liked some of the things I have heard him say and I am wondering if I
missed something?" -Pamela Wolfe (via Facebook Fan Page)

Since posting a passing comment on my Facebook fan page about Ron
Paul, I have been inundated with questions and concerns about my
support of the Texas Congressman in the current Republican Primary
race. In one of my many political posts (frequently, I post videos,
news articles, etc., in an effort to show the importance and influence
of worldview), I simply stated that I voted for Dr. Paul in the last
election, and planned to vote for him again.

The result was hundreds of comments; more than any other post I’ve
ever submitted. Most of the comments were positive. However, several
were extremely negative. Some vowed never to follow, or support my
ministry any further, while others simply communicated their dismay.
Still others, like today's questioner, just asked honest questions. As
a result, I’ve decided to explain my position, and this seemed like
the best place to do it.

Let me say ahead of time that I do not believe that politics will save
America. Nor do I believe there are any perfect candidates. There
never have been, and there never will be. Moreover, it is not my goal
to answer every objection to the Paul candidacy as I know that there
are those who, for various reasons, will not be persuaded, and more
importantly, that’s not my job. My goal here is to offer insight in to
my own reasoning as I wade through another political season and make a
personal choice.
I. Ron Paul is a Christian Conservative

While I am not looking for a “Pastor-in-Chief,” it is important to me
that the man for whom I cast my vote be a Christian, if at all
possible. And though I recognize that there is not always a clear
Christian choice (i.e., the 2008 election), I agree with Chief Justice
John Jay who wrote, “Providence has given to our people the choice of
their rulers, and it is the duty as well as the privilege and interest
of our Christian nation to select and prefer Christians for their
rulers."[1] For indeed, “Before any man can be considered as a member
of Civil Society, he must be considered as a subject of the Governour
of the Universe.”[2] John Witherspoon concurs: “Those, therefore, who
pay no regard to religion and sobriety in the persons whom they send
to [public office] are guilty of the greatest absurdity and will soon
pay dear for their folly.”[3] I think we are seeing this on display
right now.[4]

My desire is not to see a president who will usurp the authority,
responsibilities, or privileges of the Church. However, I do not wish
to see those things hindered either. I also want to know that the
foundational ideology motivating a man’s decisions is biblical. I know
it will not always mirror my own, but I trust God’s word, and
appreciate those who look to it for aid in making decisions. To that
end, I support Dr. Paul because he is not just a conservative, but a
Christian Conservative.

Dr. Paul does not beat his Christian faith like a drum in his
public/political life. Unfortunately, that is off-putting for the
“Christian Right”. However, in a world full of ‘posturing’ in an
effort to win over evangelicals, I find Paul’s public demeanor
refreshing. And it is not as though he is a ‘closet Christian,’
either. “I have accepted Jesus Christ as my personal Savior, and I
endeavor every day to follow Him in all I do and in every position I
advocate,” wrote Paul on his Web site.[5] I have also had the
privilege of talking with both him, and one of his five children about
his faith and how it influences his policy positions.

Nevertheless, the more important aspect is the fact that this Southern
Baptist (raised Lutheran) is a regular church attender. What would
motivate a man to attend church, but not beat a drum about it in an
effort to win over evangelicals in an age when political figures play
at Christianity (while living totally contradictory lives, and holding
heterodox beliefs) in order to assuage the fears of the Christian
Right? Having met and talked to Dr. Paul, I would say it is
authenticity, and humility more than anything else. He wants “to avoid
any appearance of exploiting [his faith] for political gain.”[6]
II. Ron Paul is a Constitutional Conservative

Not only is Ron Paul a Christian Conservative; he is also a
Constitutional Conservative. He holds himself accountable to the
Constitution of the United States, even when it means he has to vote
against legislation that may be otherwise beneficial. This has cost
him on numerous occasions as people use the “Ron Paul voted against
so-and-so” tactic to paint a caricature of him and play “gotcha”
politics.
This is actually an important quality in a President. I don’t want a
man in the White House making decisions based on what “feels” right.
I’m not looking for a conscientious King; I want a Chief Executive. I
want a man whose decisions are predictable because of a long track
record of constitutional conservatism. I may not always agree with a
man like that, but I will always know why he did what he did, and I
can live with that. Especially in several crucial areas facing our
Republic, like money, war, States’ Rights, and foreign policy, for
example.
Constitutional Money

I support Ron Paul because he has a constitutional view of money. He
is the only candidate consistently to confront the Federal Reserve
Bank (which is not federal, has no reserves, and is not a bank), and
address the issue of fiat currency (a.k.a. unjust weights and
measures; Lev 19:36; Prov 16:11), which debases the dollar,
manipulates business cycles, creates inflation, and always benefits
the rich at the expense of the poor and disenfranchised. And he talks
about the issue in just those terms.

Congressman Paul is also the only candidate who has a budget that will
cut a TRILLION DOLLARS in spending in year one.[7] He is the only
candidate who has committed to defund and eliminate expensive,
unconstitutional agencies. This is crucial for a country headed for an
economic cliff. Our debt is larger than our GDP and we simply must
address it NOW (Luke 14:28)! This is arguably the most important issue
we face, and while others want to tinker with the status quo, Dr. Paul
wants to do the hard thing; the right thing; the biblical thing; the
constitutional thing.
Constitutional War

I support Ron Paul because he is a military veteran (yup... he refuses
to beat that drum too, which is why you may not have known that little
tidbit). And though I do not believe it is necessary for a man to have
served in the military for him to serve as President, the fact that
Congressman Paul knows and hates war lends credibility to his desire
and commitment to ending the wars and bringing our troops home.
Moreover, he has a constitutional understanding of war (only Congress
can send us to war), and a Christian commitment to historic Just War
Theory (rooted in the Sixth Commandment... HIS WORDS).[8] He, unlike
other candidates, can be counted on not to commit to acts of war
without congressional authority (i.e., unilaterally deciding to bomb a
sovereign nation if they advance their weapons technology in a region
several thousand miles away from the U.S., under the watchful eye of a
nation with over 300 nukes who can stop them in a heartbeat... but I
digress).

There is a reason Dr. Paul has received more support from members of
the military than all other candidates (Republican and Democrat)
COMBINED! The top three employers of Ron Paul’s donors are the U.S.
Army, Navy, and Air Force, respectively. Dr. Paul will not use our
military to hunt down and overthrow heads of state without
Congressional authority (i.e., Libya), kill American citizens without
warrant,[9] detain citizens indefinitely without benefit of a
trial,[10] or chase warlords in central Africa.[11] When it comes to
war, Dr. Paul understands that, “Whoever meddles in a quarrel not his
own is like one who takes a passing dog by the ears.” (Proverbs 26:17)
Constitutional States’ Rights

I support Ron Paul because he not only understands, but believes in
the Tenth Amendment. I know many Christians have been scared off by
the “Ron Paul wants to legalize drugs, gay marriage, and abortion”
rhetoric. However, looking beyond the rhetoric reveals Paul’s true
constitutional conservatism (and biblical understanding of
jurisdiction). He has personal convictions, but those will not be
allowed to steer him away from his constitutional oath. The
presidency, and the Federal Government have limits.

The President is not “Pastor in Chief.” It is not the President’s job
(or the job of the Federal Government) to set such policies. The “War
on Drugs,” for example, has been a monumental, unconstitutional,
fiscal failure (to the tune of more than $3 BILLION)![12] The Federal
Government must be held within the confines of its enumerated powers.
This is important for Christians because we will not always have
people in the White House with whom we agree (in fact, politicians
will always let us down). What happens when we send a man to the White
House with the express purpose of “changing the moral standards” of
America in our favor, then, down the line we have a president who uses
the same un-cheked powers to promote moral standards with which we
disagree? How’s that workin’ for ya’?

But what about the moral issues to which we, as Christians, must
speak? First, we must speak to them at the local level. I have no
right to look to Washington, D.C. for remedies when I am not preaching
on Mars Hill at every opportunity. The Roe v. Wade, for example,
started in Texas; not D.C.. Furthermore, there is not a single
institution more prolific in the spread of moral decay than the
government education system, and Ron Paul is the only man who plans to
get the federal government out of that business by ending the
(unconstitutional) Department of Education IMMEDIATELY (Luke 6:40).

Beyond that, if there are issues we wish to address on a federal
level, we have a federal remedy, and it is not the election of a
President; it is the amendment process. This is less favorable to
those who do not wish to do the hard work of changing hearts and minds
in the marketplace of ideas. However, the alternative is a
quasi-monarchy (or oligarchy) that changes with the wind, and a view
of the presidency that is both unbiblical and unconstitutional.
Constitutional Foreign Policy

I support Ron Paul because he has a constitutional view of foreign
policy. Ironically, our foreign policy has been so unconstitutional
for so long that many people recoil at the idea of getting it back in
line. Moreover, the semantic game Paul’s opponents play (using
“isolationism” as opposed to “non-intervention” to define his
position) doesn’t help. For most Christians, this is where they
believe I’ve left the reservation. They may not say, “We have to be
the world’s police force,” but I can’t tell you how many times I’ve
heard, “Do you know his position on Israel?” “Surely you can’t support
a man who doesn’t support Israel!”

Actually, nothing could be further from the truth. Ron Paul does
support Israel. It is our current foreign policy that does not support
Israel! However, there is a deeper issue here. There is a sort of
misplaced Dispensationalism that governs people’s sentimental attitude
toward Israel. Let me state clearly that I do not believe the Bible
demands that the U.S. support Israel. I do, however, believe that it
is wise to do so for geopolitical reasons. To do so for theological
reasons, I believe, is actually misguided, and quite dangerous.
Nevertheless, Israel is our only true ally in the Middle East, and
that is important.

But there’s a more important question: “What does it mean to “support”
Israel?” Does it mean that Israel remains God’s “Chosen People,” and
we must stand with them in anticipation of the coming Armageddon? Is
the President to act as “Commander in Chief of the United States Armed
Forces” and “Supreme Defender of Israel”? Or are we simply to make
sure the foreign aid dollars don’t stop flowing? Here are a few things
I took into to consideration in evaluating Congressman Paul’s foreign
policy.

  1. Israel is the most powerful nation in the Middle East... BY A
LONG SHOT! In fact, Israel could potentially defeat all the other
military powers in the Middle East simultaneously if they had to.
  2. We not only give money to Israel; we give money to their enemies
as well. That is not supporting Israel! That is using money to buy
influence in a region thousands of miles away from us in the name of
oil, when we happen to have the largest repository of oil on planet
earth right here in the US, but refuse to go and get it (in the name
of Earth-worshipping environmentalism)!
  3. Israel is a sovereign nation, and we have no right to treat her
like a child. Our foreign aid has been a tool used to influence
Israel’s domestic policy for far too long. If we are their friends, we
should allow them to exercise their sovereignty without our
interference, and certainly without our condemnation. Who do we think
we are? No, I disagree with my Christian brothers and sisters who
think a country who supports Israel’s enemies, interferes with
Israel’s domestic policy, condemn’s Israel in efforts to keep ties
with oil-rich countries in the region, and helps to destabilize and
radicalize one of Israel’s historic foes lurking on her southern
boarder is engaging in a foreign policy that supports Israel.

III. Ron Paul is a Consistent Conservative

Finally, I support Dr. Paul because he has been a consistent
conservative. He has been married to the same woman for more than
fifty years; delivered over 4,000 babies as an OB; never performed a
single abortion; has never voted for an unbalanced budget, a tax
increase, or a bailout; forecasted the economic debacle long before it
happened;[13] and gave back $140,000 last year through his office to
pay down the national debt (100,000 in 2010). This man is so
principled that he refuses to claim his congressional pension!

Ron Paul is the real deal. He is not perfect. He needs a savior just
like you and I do (as noted by his trust in Christ as his redeemer).
But when it’s all said and done, he is a man with whom I agree in
principle. I know where he’s coming from, and it’s not based on his
“personal story,” or his sense of what’s going to get him elected.
It’s the same thing he’s been running on (and governing from) for over
three decades; the Constitution of the United States (viewed through
the lens of a basic biblical world and life view). And I’m glad to
support a man like that.

______________________________________________________________________________

For a better understanding of Voddie's view of Christians and
Politics: Listen to this sermon series on Romans 13.

For more information on the role of the Bible in Politics, purchase
this book by Wayne Grudem


_______________________________________________________________________________

[1] The Correspondence and Public Papers of John Jay, Henry P.
Johnston, ed., New York: Burt Franklin, 1970, 4:393 [to John Murray,
Jr., October 12, 1816].

[2] The Papers of James Madison, Robert Rutland, ed., Chicago: Univ.
of Chicago Press, 1973, Vol. 8, pp. 299, 304, June 20, 1785; cited in
Barton, p. 120.

[3] Witherspoon, Works, Edinburgh, J. Ogle, 1815, IV:266-67, from "A
Sermon Delivered at a Public Thanksgiving after Peace."

[4] I realize that President Obama professes Christianity. However,
his theology, as well as the theology of the church he attended for
more than twenty years is heterodox (committed to neo-marxist, Black
Liberation Theology. There is little in his worldview that commends
his profession of faith.

[5] http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/statement-of-faith/

[6] Ibid.

[7] http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/ron-paul-plan-to-restore-america/

[8] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5nGCpzel6o

[9] http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/09/30/501364/main20113732.shtml

[10] http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/15/americans-face-guantanamo-detention-obama

[11] http://allafrica.com/view/group/main/main/id/00014859.html

[12] http://actionamerica.org/drugs/wodclock.shtml

[13] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5nGCpzel6o